ARTPIL Profiles of the Arts
Heimo Zobernig
Through May 30, 2018 / Galerie Meyer Kainer

Heimo Zobernig

As previously shown in the exhibition The Unknown Masterpiece, Heimo Zobernig structures the pictorial space of his work in layers of grid-like constructions. In light of this, one can recognize that as he sequentially develops his oeuvre across exhibition series Zobernig continues to produce new, surprising work ensembles while always remaining true to his fundamental principles.

 

Heimo Zobernig

With the picture plane now structured by the word “tHIS,” like a trellis on which the composition finds its support, one could simply count the new work among his text paintings. Yet an early Zobernig looks different from a later one, in which, over the course of time, the increasingly complex relationship between text and image has condensed to the point of their becoming indistinguishable. For Zobernig seems to put everything back on the line in every moment of production. Contrary to an intellectual reading, according to which art requires a prior intention – with the result that one is led to expect a meaning and message from the work – it is clear that for Zobernig every painterly act is constitutive, in the sense of being simultaneously both free and structured. It is structured by the habitus – it is a work by Zobernig, experts will recognize his very particular workmanship. That is the logic of practice, a freedom under structural constraint – under the constraint of habitus, of work already realized – a freedom that would not exist for another in this form.

 

Heimo Zobernig

In Zobernig’s eye and hands there is a complete set of practical schemata, schemata of perception and action, which lead him to pose practical problems and to find practical solutions to these practical problems, without necessarily taking an approach based on concept. A practical schema produces references that are not citations, which is why one can say of Zobernig that he always does the same thing, and at the same time always does extremely different things. He appears to begin a painting the way one begins a book, without knowing what he will tell, only discovering it by and by, one step after the other, starting again from the beginning, making corrections, etc.

 

Heimo Zobernig

Modernity brings with it a progression toward abstraction, toward the elimination of the subject, in the interest of accentuating formal qualities. Under these circumstances, the ability to understand the work of art, reduced to its aesthetic dimension, is depleted – quite clearly, however, with the intention of thereby liberating art. The freedom to make unstrained, at times parodic use of outdated representational forms and content, to which Zobernig tends, provokes a little aesthetic shock, yet it is a technical, practical shock.

 

Heimo Zobernig

A break with style and subject. His purely technical, pictorial approach, which seeks to avoid any indication of the intimate and subjective, has a moral component. An aesthetic-political view that tolerates no pictorial hierarchy, thus easily allowing the background to come to the fore. Using the “cut and paste” method, it can be inserted into the pictorial space like a backdrop or tapestry. Zobernig uses sketches and adds these to the compositions on the basis of his competence and practical intelligence – they have a structural function. An intelligence of a different order, however, than thinking thought, knowing knowledge, theoretical theory.

 

Heimo Zobernig

In the “tHIS” series, Zobernig uses the background like a canonical and classical subject, referencing the painterly coherence of traditional sfumato painting – yet the paint is applied by trowel, not by brush. Throughout the entire picture plane, the radiant, transparent atmosphere of the background merges with the trellis of characters and even seems to assume some of its texture and firmness, while the contours of the lettering become absorbed. A play of light and color. As a modernist, Zobernig’s practice is a formal one that serves as its own benchmark, yet is generated in conscious relation to other artists. To exist in an artistic field means to produce in relation to producer peers, for that is the lesson of structuralism: A sound exists only in relation to a range of possible sounds. Pierre Bourdieu* emphasizes the fait social total, by which he means that every social fact, including art, contains the entire system of relations that constitutes the society in question. It is upon this insight that members of the Painting 2.0 ** generation base their production, by explicitly including in their work the logic of the existence of an artistic field as a social field.

–Christian Meyer

*) Pierre Bourdieu: Manet. Eine symbolische Ordnung (Manet. A Symbolic Revolution), Suhrkamp, 2015, S.168 ff
**) Painting 2.0: Malerei im Informationszeitalter (Painting 2.0: Expression in the Information Age), Museum Brandhorst, München / mumok Wien, Prestel, 2016

 

Heimo Zobernig
Through May 30, 2018 / Galerie Meyer Kainer
For more information please visit the exhibition page >

Recent Articles
Hyperobjects
Through Nov 4, 2018 / Ballroom Marfa
A landmark group exhibition to confront the scale of today’s ecological crisis…
A landmark group exhibition to confront the scale of today’s ecological crisis seeking to create encounters with artworks…
Judson Dance Theater / The Work Is Never Done
Through Feb 3, 2019 / MoMA
Through performances, film, photography, sculptural objects, musical scores, poetry, and archival materials,…
Through performances, film, photography, sculptural objects, musical scores, poetry, and archival materials, Judson Dance Theater: The Work Is…
FIAC 2018
October 18-21, 2018 / Paris
For its 45th edition, FIAC is pleased to host at the Grand…
For its 45th edition, FIAC is pleased to host at the Grand Palais in Paris an exacting selection…
Kerry James Marshall: Collected Works
Through Nov 3, 2018 / Rennie Museum
A survey of works spanning 32 years features pieces from the complex…
A survey of works spanning 32 years features pieces from the complex body of work which interrogates the…
DESIGNART Tokyo 2018
Oct 19 – 28, 2018 / Tokyo
Through the recent years, the boundaries between design and art have been…
Through the recent years, the boundaries between design and art have been crossing over, and works surpassing such…
The Post-War Dream / Alessandro Zanoni
A visual journey into the Anthropocene
I spent six weeks in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region to document…
I spent six weeks in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region to document the transformation of cities in the…
ARTPIL / Prescription .066
The Week in Review
Another hurricane strikes North America. Trump rallies for mid-terms and meets with…
Another hurricane strikes North America. Trump rallies for mid-terms and meets with Rap star. Nikki Haley resigns as…
We Feed the World
Oct 12 - 21, 2018 / Bargehouse Gallery
This is about people, not production lines; farms not factories. This is…
This is about people, not production lines; farms not factories. This is about a farming system that regenerates…
Heimo Zobernig
Through May 30, 2018 / Galerie Meyer Kainer

Heimo Zobernig

As previously shown in the exhibition The Unknown Masterpiece, Heimo Zobernig structures the pictorial space of his work in layers of grid-like constructions. In light of this, one can recognize that as he sequentially develops his oeuvre across exhibition series Zobernig continues to produce new, surprising work ensembles while always remaining true to his fundamental principles.

 

Heimo Zobernig

With the picture plane now structured by the word “tHIS,” like a trellis on which the composition finds its support, one could simply count the new work among his text paintings. Yet an early Zobernig looks different from a later one, in which, over the course of time, the increasingly complex relationship between text and image has condensed to the point of their becoming indistinguishable. For Zobernig seems to put everything back on the line in every moment of production. Contrary to an intellectual reading, according to which art requires a prior intention – with the result that one is led to expect a meaning and message from the work – it is clear that for Zobernig every painterly act is constitutive, in the sense of being simultaneously both free and structured. It is structured by the habitus – it is a work by Zobernig, experts will recognize his very particular workmanship. That is the logic of practice, a freedom under structural constraint – under the constraint of habitus, of work already realized – a freedom that would not exist for another in this form.

 

Heimo Zobernig

In Zobernig’s eye and hands there is a complete set of practical schemata, schemata of perception and action, which lead him to pose practical problems and to find practical solutions to these practical problems, without necessarily taking an approach based on concept. A practical schema produces references that are not citations, which is why one can say of Zobernig that he always does the same thing, and at the same time always does extremely different things. He appears to begin a painting the way one begins a book, without knowing what he will tell, only discovering it by and by, one step after the other, starting again from the beginning, making corrections, etc.

 

Heimo Zobernig

Modernity brings with it a progression toward abstraction, toward the elimination of the subject, in the interest of accentuating formal qualities. Under these circumstances, the ability to understand the work of art, reduced to its aesthetic dimension, is depleted – quite clearly, however, with the intention of thereby liberating art. The freedom to make unstrained, at times parodic use of outdated representational forms and content, to which Zobernig tends, provokes a little aesthetic shock, yet it is a technical, practical shock.

 

Heimo Zobernig

A break with style and subject. His purely technical, pictorial approach, which seeks to avoid any indication of the intimate and subjective, has a moral component. An aesthetic-political view that tolerates no pictorial hierarchy, thus easily allowing the background to come to the fore. Using the “cut and paste” method, it can be inserted into the pictorial space like a backdrop or tapestry. Zobernig uses sketches and adds these to the compositions on the basis of his competence and practical intelligence – they have a structural function. An intelligence of a different order, however, than thinking thought, knowing knowledge, theoretical theory.

 

Heimo Zobernig

In the “tHIS” series, Zobernig uses the background like a canonical and classical subject, referencing the painterly coherence of traditional sfumato painting – yet the paint is applied by trowel, not by brush. Throughout the entire picture plane, the radiant, transparent atmosphere of the background merges with the trellis of characters and even seems to assume some of its texture and firmness, while the contours of the lettering become absorbed. A play of light and color. As a modernist, Zobernig’s practice is a formal one that serves as its own benchmark, yet is generated in conscious relation to other artists. To exist in an artistic field means to produce in relation to producer peers, for that is the lesson of structuralism: A sound exists only in relation to a range of possible sounds. Pierre Bourdieu* emphasizes the fait social total, by which he means that every social fact, including art, contains the entire system of relations that constitutes the society in question. It is upon this insight that members of the Painting 2.0 ** generation base their production, by explicitly including in their work the logic of the existence of an artistic field as a social field.

–Christian Meyer

*) Pierre Bourdieu: Manet. Eine symbolische Ordnung (Manet. A Symbolic Revolution), Suhrkamp, 2015, S.168 ff
**) Painting 2.0: Malerei im Informationszeitalter (Painting 2.0: Expression in the Information Age), Museum Brandhorst, München / mumok Wien, Prestel, 2016

 

Heimo Zobernig
Through May 30, 2018 / Galerie Meyer Kainer
For more information please visit the exhibition page >